Debate of the Week: Are We Entering a New Macro Regime — or the Final Phase of the Old One?

One of the most persistent and animated debates this week centred on whether markets are already transitioning into a new macro regime, or whether current conditions represent the most fragile stage of the existing cycle.

On one side, members pointed to clear regime-shift signals:

• Global liquidity accelerating while inflation continues to cool
• Gold overtaking the dollar in central-bank reserves for the first time in modern history
• Capital quietly rotating toward real assets, commodities and non-US exposure
• Geopolitics influencing markets through enforcement and supply disruption rather than diplomacy

From this perspective, the argument is that markets are repricing structure, not noise with energy, commodities, defence and alternative stores of value acting as early indicators of a multi-year transition.

On the other side, some members cautioned that valuation extremes and narrative saturation resemble late-cycle conditions rather than early-cycle opportunity. They argued that:

• Equity valuations now exceed historic peaks in parts of the market
• Liquidity-driven rallies can persist longer than expected, but remain vulnerable to sudden volatility
• AI enthusiasm risks colliding with physical constraints such as power, grids and deployment timelines
• Cyclical rebounds can be mistaken for regime change before leadership truly broadens

This camp sees today’s environment as one where both outcomes remain plausible making positioning, timing and risk control more important than conviction alone.

What made the debate compelling was not disagreement on direction, but disagreement on where we are in the transition early innings of a new playbook, or late innings of the old one.

That tension shaped discussions across geopolitics, commodities, AI infrastructure, digital assets and macro positioning throughout the week  and remains unresolved heading into 2026.

‍

Further Discussion Inside the Collective

This week’s conversations moved fast and wide – from geopolitics and liquidity to AI infrastructure and late-cycle valuation risk. Members debated where 2026 narratives may be overstating reality, where genuine regime shifts are forming, and how positioning is evolving beneath headline moves. Below is a snapshot of the themes shaping sentiment inside the Collective.

Geopolitics re-entered markets through hard power, not diplomacy

Members analysed a major regime intervention and its immediate knock-on effects across energy, shipping, defence and sovereign debt. The focus quickly shifted from headline politics to second-order consequences: supply disruption, infrastructure repair cycles and who benefits before normalisation begins.

Liquidity is rising  but valuation risk is no longer theoretical

There was strong debate around accelerating global liquidity alongside growing concern that parts of the equity market now exceed historic valuation extremes. Members discussed how bubbles form before they burst, and why timing — not direction - is the hardest variable to manage.

AI infrastructure faces real-world constraints

Discussion pushed beyond AI hype into physical bottlenecks: power, grids, energy costs and timelines. Members debated whether cloud-centric models can scale fast enough, and whether efficiency, edge processing and hardware architecture may matter more than raw model intelligence.

China’s strategic positioning in AI and commodities drew scrutiny

Several conversations focused on China’s ability to compete on cost, speed and industrial deployment across AI systems, base metals and energy inputs. Members debated whether Western markets are mispricing the competitive gap forming beneath the surface.

Digital assets regained attention through relative value, not speculation

Rather than price chasing, discussion centred on positioning signals, long-term holder behaviour and relative valuation versus traditional stores of value. The tone was analytical, with members weighing structure and cycle alignment into 2026.

Energy markets showed signs of exhaustion and potential reversal

Oil and gas debates intensified as positioning reached extreme pessimism. Members examined whether long-dated technical patterns and supply underinvestment could collide with rising demand from data centres and geopolitics.

Commodities signalled tightening after long dormancy

Base and precious metals resurfaced as a key theme, with members comparing technical signals, supply discipline and renewed institutional interest. Several discussions focused on which metals move first when cycles turn.

Healthcare sparked one of the week’s sharpest valuation debates

A breakthrough development triggered disagreement around whether markets were under-reacting or simply waiting for confirmation. The discussion highlighted how asymmetric outcomes often split opinion before consensus forms.

Volatility patterns echoed prior market turning points

Members flagged historical similarities in volatility behaviour, debating whether current calm masks rising instability. The conversation focused less on prediction and more on preparation.

🔗 Access the full daily Chat Wrap

Get in touch to begin your free trial → click here

‍